1. Home
  2. /

    Articles
  3. /

    Exploring the Contrast: Distinguishing Cricket's Laws from its ‘Spirit’
Exploring the Contrast: Distinguishing Cricket's Laws from its ‘Spirit’
Johny Bairstow . Source: Cricket365

Exploring the Contrast: Distinguishing Cricket's Laws from its ‘Spirit’

The second Ashes Test concluded in a tense manner on Sunday due to the controversial dismissal of English batsman Johny Bairstow. The stumping incident angered the pro-England crowd at Lord's Cricket Ground and caused division within the cricketing community.

Though the Australians would have preferred a less contentious victory, did they actually commit any wrongdoing?

In response to that question, it is widely accepted, even by the English team, that Bairstow's dismissal was under the laws of cricket. However, critics invoked the concept of the "spirit of cricket" to argue that the Australians should not have appealed for the dismissal. So, what is the distinction?

The laws of cricket outline the rules of the game worldwide and have been administered by the Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC) in London for over two centuries. The rules are clear, and many English fans, former players, as well as the current captain and coach, have acknowledged that the umpires made the correct decision based on those rules.

Cricket fans reacting to the controversial dismissal of Jonny Bairstow. Source: Midjourney
Cricket fans reacting to the controversial dismissal of Jonny Bairstow. Source: Midjourney

This is where the "spirit" comes into play. Since the late 1990s, the laws of cricket have included an introductory statement or preamble. It states that cricket should be played not only by the laws but also in the "spirit of cricket." This preamble serves as a reminder to players and officials of their responsibility to uphold the true sportsmanship of cricket.

The two team captains bear the primary responsibility for ensuring fair play and upholding the spirit of the game. This entails ensuring that players display respect for each other, officials, and the traditional values of cricket. It goes against the spirit of the game to engage in actions such as disputing an umpire's decision, verbally or physically abusing players or umpires, or cheating. The problem lies in the fact that the "spirit of cricket" is a subjective and somewhat ambiguous concept. Respected English cricket writers have even suggested that it has not existed since 1882, citing an example involving the "father of cricket," W.G. Grace himself.

While cricket is unified by its laws, it is a global game, and the interpretation of the "spirit" varies around the world. As a result, opinions regarding Bairstow's dismissal have been highly polarised. Many English players and fans are deeply upset by what transpired and accuse Australia of violating the "spirit of cricket." The fact that they narrowly lost the match undoubtedly intensified these feelings. Their anger is evident in the front-page stories of numerous English newspapers and social media posts. Twitter, in particular, has seen tens of thousands of tweets under trending hashtags such as #Ashes, #Bairstow, and #SpiritofCricket.

Interestingly, a closer look at these hashtags reveals numerous accusations of hypocrisy by the English, supported by examples of England's questionable and sometimes very similar behaviour. These examples include prominent figures such as English players Stuart Broad and Jonny Bairstow, as well as coach Brendon McCullum.

Furthermore, the only player who has been fined for breaching the spirit of the game in this Ashes series is English player Moeen Ali.

Former Australian captain Ricky Ponting emphasised that a crucial aspect of the spirit of cricket is respecting the umpire's decision, which, in this case, he claimed the English players, fans, and media failed to do. In fact, several MCC members have been suspended due to their mistreatment of Australian cricketers when they returned to the dressing room. Perhaps the key lesson that both sides can learn is encapsulated in the old saying that people who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones, especially in the modern age when evidence can quickly be found on the internet.

Neither country has a flawless record when it comes to the "spirit of cricket." Both should exercise caution in claiming the moral high ground. Trevor Chappell's underarm bowl remains one of the most infamous Australian examples, still remembered over 40 years later.

Bairstow's dismissal is the most recent controversy and is unlikely to be the last.

Security measures implemented by Cricket Australia. Source: Midjourney
Security measures implemented by Cricket Australia. Source: Midjourney

As the Australian team prepares for the third Test in Leeds, starting on Thursday, there are concerns that tensions could escalate both on and off the field. Leeds is known for its lively atmosphere. Cricket Australia has increased security for the Australian team and reportedly advised players to remain extra vigilant when dining out in restaurants for the remainder of the Ashes.

Cricketers may never reach a complete consensus on the "spirit of cricket" and whether the Australians violated it on this occasion. Perhaps the closest players can come to an agreement is to align with former Australian bowler and Yorkshire coach Jason Gillespie, who believes that playing within the laws of the game is equivalent to playing within the spirit of the game. Let's hope that the remaining matches of the series see a reduction in tensions and a greater focus on playing the last three Tests fiercely but fairly, without reigniting debates about the "spirit of cricket" that no one ultimately wins.

Share

Get the latest news to your inbox.

Subscribe to the newsletter

We value your privacy and promise not to distribute your email to third parties.